Michael Harrison

Positions:

Associate Professor of Medicine

Medicine, Medical Oncology
School of Medicine

Member of the Duke Cancer Institute

Duke Cancer Institute
School of Medicine

Education:

M.D. 2004

Tulane University

residency, Medicine

Tulane University

Grants:

Bladder Cancer in Older Adults - Treatment and Outcomes

Administered By
Duke Clinical Research Institute
Role
Co Investigator
Start Date
End Date

ATLAS: A Phase 2, Open-label Study of Rucaparib in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Administered By
Duke Cancer Institute
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

XL184-IST64

Administered By
Duke Cancer Institute
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

A Phase 3, Open-label, Randomized Study of Nivolumab Combined with Ipilimumab, or with Standard of Care Chemotherapy, versus Standard of Care Chemotherapy in Participants with Previously Untreated Unr

Administered By
Duke Cancer Institute
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

Phase II Single Arm Study of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin plus Pembrolizumab as Neoadjuvant Therapy Prior to Radical Cystectomy in Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Administered By
Duke Cancer Institute
Awarded By
University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Role
Principal Investigator
Start Date
End Date

Publications:

Prostate-specific antigen response in black and white patients treated with abiraterone acetate for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Evidence suggests differences in androgen receptor AR signaling between black (B) and white (W) patients with prostate cancer, but pivotal trials of abiraterone acetate (AA) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) enrolled few black patients, a population with a higher mortality from prostate cancer. Our primary objective was to determine differences in response to AA between B and W patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case-control study of B vs. W patients treated with AA between May 1, 2008 and June 16, 2015 at Duke University Medical Center. Patients were identified (W control patients were matched 2:1 to B patients stratified based on previous docetaxel exposure) through pharmacy records and were eligible if treated with AA for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patients with previous enzalutamide use were excluded. The primary objective was to compare the rate of≥90% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline from baseline between B vs. W patients. Secondary outcomes included comparing time on therapy, time to PSA progression, and overall survival among groups. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics among patients (n = 45 B, n = 90 W) were identified; these included Karnofsky performance status, PSA, Gleason score, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase, opiate use for pain, and metastatic sites. Baseline characteristics among groups were similar except for median hemoglobin (B = 11.4g/dl, W = 12.3g/dl). The proportion of B patients achieving a≥90% PSA level decline was 37.8% vs. 28.9% for W patients (P = 0.296). Statistically significant differences were found in the proportion of patients achieving a≥50% PSA level decline (B = 68.9%, W = 48.9% [P = 0.028]) and≥30% PSA level decline (B = 77.8%, W = 54.4% [P = 0.008]). Rates of primary abiraterone-refractory disease (PSA increase as best response) trended higher in W (31.1%) than in B (15.6%) patients (P = 0.052). Median treatment duration (B = 9.4 mo, W = 8.3 mo) did not differ (Wilcoxon P = 0.444). Median overall survival (B = 27.3 mo [95% CI: 13.9, not estimable], W = 24.8 mo [95% CI: 19, 31.6] [P = 0.669]) and median time to PSA progression (B = 11.0 mo [95% CI: 4.3, 18.0], W = 9.4 mo [95% CI: 6.2, 13.0] [P = 0.917]) did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Black patients may have a higher PSA response to AA than white patients. An ongoing prospective clinical study (NCT01940276) is evaluating outcomes between black and white patients treated with AA.
Authors
Ramalingam, S; Humeniuk, MS; Hu, R; Rasmussen, J; Healy, P; Wu, Y; Harrison, MR; Armstrong, AJ; George, DJ; Zhang, T
MLA Citation
Ramalingam, Sundhar, et al. “Prostate-specific antigen response in black and white patients treated with abiraterone acetate for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer..” Urol Oncol, vol. 35, no. 6, June 2017, pp. 418–24. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.12.016.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1172375
PMID
28126272
Source
pubmed
Published In
Urol Oncol
Volume
35
Published Date
Start Page
418
End Page
424
DOI
10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.12.016

Physician treatment selection in the prospective Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer (MaRCC) Registry.

Authors
Kyriakopoulos, C; Harrison, MR; Bhavsar, NA; Wolf, SP; Costello, BA; Stadler, WM; Hammers, HJ; Vaishampayan, UN; Appleman, LJ; Creel, PA; Samsa, GP; Richardson, EM; Johnson, KA; Borham, A; George, DJ
MLA Citation
Kyriakopoulos, Christos, et al. “Physician treatment selection in the prospective Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer (MaRCC) Registry..” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 34, no. 2_suppl, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2016, pp. 563–563. Crossref, doi:10.1200/jco.2016.34.2_suppl.563.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1149424
Source
crossref
Published In
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
Volume
34
Published Date
Start Page
563
End Page
563
DOI
10.1200/jco.2016.34.2_suppl.563

Updated survival results from a randomized, dose-ranging phase II study of nivolumab (NIVO) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

Authors
Plimack, ER; Hammers, HJ; Rini, BI; McDermott, DF; Redman, B; Kuzel, T; Harrison, MR; Vaishampayan, UN; Drabkin, HA; George, S; Logan, TF; Margolin, KA; Xu, L-A; Waxman, I; Motzer, R
MLA Citation
Plimack, Elizabeth R., et al. “Updated survival results from a randomized, dose-ranging phase II study of nivolumab (NIVO) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)..” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 33, no. 15_suppl, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2015, pp. 4553–4553. Crossref, doi:10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.4553.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1085447
Source
crossref
Published In
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
Volume
33
Published Date
Start Page
4553
End Page
4553
DOI
10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.4553

A phase 2 study of KX2-391, an oral inhibitor of Src kinase and tubulin polymerization, in men with bone-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: KX2-391 is an oral non-ATP-competitive inhibitor of Src kinase and tubulin polymerization. In phase 1 trials, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) declines were seen in patients with advanced prostate cancer. We conducted a single-arm phase 2 study evaluating KX2-391 in men with chemotherapy-naïve bone-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). METHODS: We treated 31 patients with oral KX2-391 (40 mg twice-daily) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was 24-week progression-free survival (PFS); a 50 % success rate was pre-defined as clinically significant. Secondary endpoints included PSA progression-free survival (PPFS) and PSA response rates. Exploratory outcomes included pharmacokinetic studies, circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration, and analysis of markers of bone resorption [urinary N-telopeptide (uNTx); C-telopeptide (CTx)] and formation [bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP); osteocalcin]. RESULTS: The trial closed early after accrual of 31 patients, due to a pre-specified futility rule. PFS at 24 weeks was 8 %, and median PFS was 18.6 weeks. The PSA response rate (≥ 30 % decline) was 10 %, and median PPFS was 5.0 weeks. Additionally, 18 % of men with unfavorable (≥ 5) CTCs at baseline converted to favorable (<5) CTCs with treatment. The proportion of men with declines in bone turnover markers was 32 % for uNTx, 21 % for CTx, 10 % for BAP, and 25 % for osteocalcin. In pharmacokinetic studies, median C max was 61 (range 16-129) ng/mL, and median AUC was 156 (35-348) ng h/mL. Common toxicities included hepatic derangements, myelosuppression, fatigue, nausea, and constipation. CONCLUSION: KX2-391 dosed at 40 mg twice-daily lacks antitumor activity in men with CRPC, but has modest effects on bone turnover markers. Because a C max of ≥142 ng/mL is required for tubulin polymerization inhibition (defined from preclinical studies), higher once-daily dosing will be used in future trials.
Authors
Antonarakis, ES; Heath, EI; Posadas, EM; Yu, EY; Harrison, MR; Bruce, JY; Cho, SY; Wilding, GE; Fetterly, GJ; Hangauer, DG; Kwan, M-FR; Dyster, LM; Carducci, MA
MLA Citation
Antonarakis, Emmanuel S., et al. “A phase 2 study of KX2-391, an oral inhibitor of Src kinase and tubulin polymerization, in men with bone-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer..” Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, vol. 71, no. 4, Apr. 2013, pp. 883–92. Pubmed, doi:10.1007/s00280-013-2079-z.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub939976
PMID
23314737
Source
pubmed
Published In
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol
Volume
71
Published Date
Start Page
883
End Page
892
DOI
10.1007/s00280-013-2079-z

Pazopanib for the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Dramatic advances in the care of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma have occurred over the last ten years, including insights into the molecular pathogenesis of this disease, that have now been translated into paradigm-changing therapeutic strategies. Elucidating the importance of signaling cascades related to angiogenesis is notable among these achievements. Pazopanib is a novel small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets VEGFR-1, -2, and -3; PDGFR-α, PDGFR-β; and c-kit tyrosine kinases. This agent exhibits a distinct pharmacokinetic profile as well as toxicity profile compared to other agents in the class of VEGF signaling pathway inhibitors. This review will discuss the scientific rationale for the development of pazopanib, as well as preclinical and clinical trials that led to approval of pazopanib for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. The most recent information, including data from 2010 national meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the design of ongoing Phase III trials, will be discussed. Finally, an algorithm utilizing Level I evidence for the treatment of patients with this disease will be proposed.
Authors
Lang, JM; Harrison, MR
MLA Citation
Lang, Joshua M., and Michael R. Harrison. “Pazopanib for the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma..” Clin Med Insights Oncol, vol. 4, Oct. 2010, pp. 95–105. Pubmed, doi:10.4137/CMO.S4088.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub775836
PMID
20981133
Source
pubmed
Published In
Clin Med Insights Oncol
Volume
4
Published Date
Start Page
95
End Page
105
DOI
10.4137/CMO.S4088